Images
-
Summary
-
Femoral neck fractures are common injuries to the proximal femur associated with increased risk of avascular necrosis, and high levels of patient morbidity and mortality.
-
Diagnosis is generally made radiographically with orthogonal radiographs of the hip.
-
Treatment is generally operative with open reduction and internal fixation versus arthroplasty depending on the age of the patient, activity demands and pre-injury mobility.
-
-
Epidemiology
-
Incidence
-
common
-
increasingly common due to aging population
-
-
-
Demographics
-
women > men
-
Caucasians > African Americans
-
United states has highest incidence of hip fx rates worldwide
-
-
-
Etiology
-
Pathophysiology
-
healing potential
-
femoral neck is intracapsular, bathed in synovial fluid
-
lacks periosteal layer
-
callus formation limited, which affects healing
-
-
-
Mechanism
-
high energy in young patients
-
low energy falls in older patients
-
-
Associated injuries
-
femoral shaft fractures
-
6-9% associated with femoral neck fractures
-
treat femoral neck first followed by shaft
-
-
-
-
Anatomy
-
Osteology
-
normal neck shaft-angle 130 +/- 7 degrees
-
normal anteversion 10 +/- 7 degrees
-
-
Blood supply to femoral head
-
major contributor is medial femoral circumflex (lateral epiphyseal artery)
-
some contribution to anterior and inferior head from lateral femoral circumflex
-
some contribution from inferior gluteal artery
-
small and insignificant supply from artery of ligamentum teres
-
displacement of femoral neck fracture will disrupt the blood supply and cause an intracapsular hematoma (effect is controversial)
-
-
-
Classification
-
-
Garden Classification
-
(based on AP radiographs and does not consider lateral or sagittal plane alignment)
-
Type I
-
Incomplete fx (valgus impacted)
-
Type II
-
Complete fx, nondisplaced
-
Type III
-
Complete fx, partially displaced
-
Type IV
-
Complete fx, fully displaced
-
-
-
Simplified Garden Classification
-
Nondisplaced
-
Includes Garden I and II
-
Displaced
-
Includes Garden IIII and IV
-
-
-
Pauwels Classification
-
(based on vertical orientation of fracture line)
-
Type I
-
< 30 deg from horizontal
-
Type II
-
30 to 50 deg from horizontal
-
Type III
-
> 50 deg from horizontal (most unstable with highest risk ofnonunion/AVN)
-
-
-
Presentation
-
Symptoms
-
impacted and stress fractures
-
slight pain in the groin or pain referred along the medial side of the thigh and knee
-
-
displaced fractures
-
pain in the entire hip region
-
-
-
Physical exam
-
impacted and stress fractures
-
no obvious clinical deformity
-
minor discomfort with active or passive hip range of motion, muscle spasms at extremes of motion
-
pain with percussion over greater trochanter
-
-
displaced fractures
-
leg in external rotation and abduction, with shortening
-
-
-
-
Imaging
-
Radiographs
-
recommended views
-
AP
-
traction-internal rotation AP hip is best for defining fracture type
-
-
cross-table lateral
-
full-length femur
-
-
optional views
-
consider obtaining dedicated imaging of uninjured hip to use as template intraop
-
-
-
CT
-
indications
-
helpful in determining displacement and degree of comminution in some patients
-
-
-
MRI
-
indications
-
helpful to rule out occult fracture
-
not helpful in reliably assessing viability of femoral head after fracture
-
-
-
Bone scan
-
indications
-
helpful to rule out occult fracture
-
not helpful in reliably assessing viability of femoral head after fracture
-
-
-
Duplex Scanning
-
indications
-
rule out DVT if delayed presentation to hospital after hip fracture
-
-
-
-
Treatment
-
Nonoperative
-
observation alone
-
indications
-
may be considered in some patients who are non-ambulators, have minimal pain, and who are at high risk for surgical intervention
-
-
-
-
Operative
-
closed reduction with cannulated screw fixation
-
indications
-
nondisplaced transcervical fx
-
Garden I or II in the physiologically elderly
-
displaced transcervical fx in young patient
-
achieve reduction to limit vascular insult
-
reduction must be anatomic, so open if necessary
-
-
-
-
open reduction internal fixation (ORIF)
-
indications
-
displaced fractures in young or physiologically young patients
-
ORIF indicated for most pts <50 years of age
-
female sex associated with increased reoperation rate
-
-
-
-
techniques
-
sliding hip screw
-
indications
-
basicervical fracture
-
vertical fracture pattern in a young patient
-
sliding hip screw biomechanically superior to cannulated screws (may not be clinically superior)
-
-
-
consider placement of additional cannulated screw above sliding hip screw to prevent rotation
-
-
-
-
hemiarthroplasty
-
indications
-
controversial
-
debilitated elderly patients
-
metabolic bone disease
-
-
techniques
-
cemented hemiarthroplasty
-
decreased intraoperative and postoperative fracture rates in elderly insufficiency fractures
-
improved short and medium term mobility
-
-
-
-
total hip arthoplasty
-
indications
-
controversial
-
older active patients
-
patients with preexisting hip osteoarthritis
-
more predictable pain relief and better functional outcome than hemiarthroplasty
-
-
Garden III or IV in patient < 85 years
-
-
-
-
-
Techniques
-
General Technical Principles
-
time to surgery
-
controversial
-
reduction method and quality has more pronounced effect on healing than surgical timing
-
-
elderly patients with hip fractures should be brought to surgery as soon as medically optimal (preferably <24-48 hours)
-
the benefits of early mobilization cannot be overemphasized
-
improved outcomes in medically fit patients if surgically treated less than 4 days from injury
-
-
preoperative echocardiograms have been shown to delay the time to surgery without any effect on treatment decisions
-
-
-
anesthesia type
-
spinal versus general
-
no difference in postoperative delirium, mortality or ambulatory function at 60 days
-
-
-
treatment approach based on
-
degree of displacement
-
physiologic age of the patient (young is < than 50 years old)
-
ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures
-
-
-
Closed reduction with cannulated screw fixation
-
technique
-
three screws if noncomminuted (3 screw inverted triangle shown to be superior to two screws)
-
order of screw placement (this varies)
-
1-inferior screw along calcar
-
2-posterior/superior screw
-
3-anterior/superior screw
-
-
obtain as much screw spread as possible in femoral neck
-
inverted triangle along the calcar (not central in the neck) has stronger fixation and higher load to failure
-
four screws considered for posterior comminution
-
clear advantage of additional screws not proven in literature
-
-
starting point at or above level of lesser trochanter to avoid fracture
-
avoid multiple cortical perforations during guide pin or screw placement to avoid development of lateral stress riser
-
-
-
Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF)
-
approach
-
limited anterior Smith-Peterson
-
10cm skin incision made beginning just distal to AIIS
-
incise deep fascia
-
develop interval between sartorious and TFL
-
external rotation of thigh accentuates dissection plane
-
LFCN is identified and retracted medially with sartorius
-
identify tendinous portion of rectus femoris, elevate off hip capsule
-
open capsule to identify femoral neck
-
-
Watson-Jones
-
used to gain improved exposure of lower femoral neck fractures
-
skin incision approx 2cm posterior and distal to ASIS, down toward tip of greater trochanter
-
incision curved distally and extended 10cm along anterior portion of femur
-
incise deep fascia
-
develop interval between TFL and gluteus medius
-
anterior aspect of gluteus medius and minimus is retracted posteriorly to visualize anterior hip capsule
-
capsule sharply incised with Z-shape incision
-
capsulotomy must remain anterior to lesser trochanter at all times to avoid injury to medial femoral circumflex artery
-
-
-
reduction
-
open versus closed reduction
-
worse outcomes with displacement > 5 mm (higher rate of osteonecrosis and nonunions)
-
no consensus on which reduction approach is superior
-
multiple closed reduction attempts are associated with higher risk of osteonecrosis of the femoral head
-
-
technique
-
evacuate hematoma
-
place A to P k-wires into femoral neck/head proximal to fracture to use as joysticks for reduction
-
insert starting k-wire (for either cannulated screw or sliding hip screw) into appropriate position laterally, up to but not across the fracture
-
once reduction obtained, drive starting k-wire across fracture
-
insert second threaded tipped k-wire if adding additional fixation
-
-
-
fixation
-
fixation with implants that allow sliding
-
permit dynamic compression at fx site during axial loading
-
can cause shortening of femoral neck
-
prominent implants
-
affects biomechanics of hip joint
-
lower physical function on SF-36
-
decreased quality of life
-
-
anatomic reduction with intraop compression and placement of length stable devices decrease shortening
-
-
-
-
Hemiarthroplasty
-
approach
-
posterior approach has increased risk of dislocations
-
anterolateral approach has increased abductor weakness
-
-
technique
-
cemented superior to uncemented in elderly population (decreased revision rates)
-
unipolar vs. bipolar
-
-
-
Total Hip Replacement
-
technique
-
should consider using the anterolateral approach and selective use of larger heads in the setting of a femoral neck fracture
-
-
advantages
-
improved functional hip scores and lower re-operation rates compared to hemiarthroplasty and internal fixation
-
-
complications
-
higher rate of dislocation with THA (~ 10%)
-
about five times higher than hemiarthroplasty
-
-
-
-
-
Complications
-
Osteonecrosis
-
incidence of 10-45%
-
recent studies fail to demonstrate an association between time to fracture reduction and subsequent AVN
-
increased risk with
-
increase initial displacement
-
AVN can still develop in nondisplaced injuries
-
-
nonanatomical reduction
-
sliding hip screw
-
reported by the FAITH study
-
-
-
treatment
-
major symptoms not always present when AVN develops
-
young patient
-
> 50% involvement then treat with FVFG vs THA
-
-
older patient
-
prosthetic replacement (hemiarthroplasty vs THA)
-
-
-
-
Nonunion
-
incidence of 5 to 30%
-
increased incidence in displaced fractures
-
no correlation between age, gender, and rate of nonunion
-
-
varus malreduction most closely correlates with failure of fixation after reduction and cannulated screw fixation.
-
treatment
-
valgus intertrochanteric osteotomy
-
indicated in patients after femoral neck nonunion
-
can be done even in presence of AVN, as long as not severely collapsed
-
turns vertical fx line into horizontal fx line and decreases shear forces across fx line
-
-
-
free vascularized fibula graft (FVFG)
-
indicated in young patients with a viable femoral head
-
-
arthroplasty
-
indicated in older patients or when the femoral head is not viable
-
also an option in younger patient with a nonviable femoral head as opposed to FVFG
-
-
revision ORIF
-
-
-
Dislocation
-
higher rate of dislocation with THA (~ 10%)
-
about seven times higher than hemiarthroplasty
-
-
-
Failure rates
-
high early failure rates in fixation group, which stabilizes after 2 years
-
2-year follow-up (elderly population >70 years) with displaced femoral neck fractures
-
46% failure with fixation techniques
-
8% failure with arthroplasty techniques
-
-
2-to-10 year follow-up
-
failure rate approx. 2-4%, respectively
-
-
-
overall failure rates still higher in fixation vs. arthoplasty at 10-year follow-up
-
sliding hip screw with lower reoperation rates compared to cannulated screws
-
displaced femoral neck fractures
-
basicervical femoral neck fractures
-
current smokers
-
-
-
Reducing complications with co-management service
-
orthopaedic geriatric co-management of trauma patients has been demonstrated to yield
-
decreased mortality, post-operative complications, time to surgery, length of stay (though conflicting results on length of stay)
-
improved post-operative mobility at 4 months
-
-
important to mitigate risks of hospital delirium which may lead to increased length of stay
-
-
Loss of independence
-
requiring walking aids and assisted living following fracture surgery
-
the timed up and go (TUG) test has been identified as a reliable predictor of a patient's need for post-operative assistive devices
-
Normal TUG is <12 seconds in all age groups
-
Persistent use of ambulatory aids is predicted if TUG > 26 seconds
-
-
-
associated factors
-
age >80 years
-
ASA class >1
-
prior walking aid use
-
current tobacco use
-
implant placement quality
-
nondisplaced fracture
-
not requiring revision surgery
-
-
-
-
Prognosis
-
Most expensive fracture to treat on per-person basis
-
Mortality
-
~25-30% at one year (higher than vertebral compression fractures)
-
-
Predictors of mortality
-
pre-injury mobility is the most significant determinant for post-operative survival
-
in patients with chronic renal failure, rates of mortality at 2 years postoperatively, are close to 45%
-
mortality risk is decreased at 30 days and at 1 year post-op when surgical intervention is performed within 24 hours of admission
-
-